Economics Of Healthcare In The Uk Essays - , Term Papers

Economics Of Healthcare In The Uk Economics & The Welfare State Essay Healthcare Good health is an important factor to an individual's welfare. It is an essential prerequisite for the enjoyment of life. For this reason the importance of healthcare to governments is great and vast amounts of resources are allocated to healthcare, for example in the UK healthcare equates for 6% of GNP. Some argue that Healthcare is a social issue rather than economic but the allocation of scarce resources and the inelastic demand for healthcare lends it self to economic analysis. Equitable allocation of a commodity is one in which everyone receives a minimum standard and quantity. So in terms of full equality in the society everyone should consume the commodity equally. In healthcare this argument becomes complicated, should everyone receive a minimum standard of healthcare? Or should everyone get the best healthcare available? The truth is that hospital buildings, doctors and medical equipment all take up resources. The best standard of healthcare could only be given if all of the government's resources were allocated to the provision of health. This would be a foolish thing to do, as other commodities would not be produced which may be detrimental to health and other aspects of life. Healthcare is different from all other products in that the (supplier) doctor knows more about it than the (consumer) patient. Consumers can distinguish between two types of product and choose the one, which gives them greatest utility but with health care the patient is not educated enough about medicine to choose between two treatments and must therefore go with what the doctor recommends. This imbalance of knowledge gives the healthcare industry suppliers monopoly power. A healthcare supplier could lower the standard of service and not fear loss of customers. A doctor may also recommend a treatment that is costly and therefore will bring in higher profit for himself without the average person knowing any better. Economics

Should English be Law essays

Should English be Law essays From the article Should English Be the Law Robert D. King disputes the controversial issue of linguistics in the U.S. Mr. Kings views on immigration and nationality will be analyzed. The pros and cons of a multi-linguistic country are discussed along with the negative effects on countries that currently operate under a multi-linguistic commonality. English as the official language is becoming more of an issue in modern day society. Since there was no need to legislate English as the official language, our constitution is silent in the issue (King, 239). The idea of English as the official language was first proposed in 1975 as an amendment to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (King). In 1981 Senator S. I. Hayakawa introduced to the U.S. senate a constitutional amendment that not only would have made English the official language, but prohibited federal law as well as state law to require the use of the language (King, 240). The legislation was unpopular and did not pass through the 97th Congress. Mr. Hayakawas view were forgotten and in submission until 1986, when ten states passed official language initiatives. The votes were substantial enough to gain the attention of Congress. Many politicians as well as the American public opposed the idea at the time, but the question was still pertinent in the states. Is America threatened by the preservation of other languages, other than English (King 242)? Though a relatively new issue in the United States, the trouble of a multi-lingual society has been prevalent for years. Language has been known in many different societies to be the main cause of division among several world nations. After the first World War, it came to drawing the boundary lines for various countries and it was principally language that guided the draftsmans hand (King 244). Due to the language barrier, many of ...